<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for stockspinoffblog.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stockspinoffblog.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stockspinoffblog.com</link>
	<description>Stock spin-off investing news and information.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:58:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Mead Johnson (MJN) Stock Spin-off Via IPO Offers Lessons by Spin-off Stocks and Overhang (or lack thereof) &#124; stockspinoffblog.com</title>
		<link>http://stockspinoffblog.com/2010/03/02/mead-johnson-mjn-stock-spin-off-via-ipo-offers-lessons/comment-page-1/#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>Spin-off Stocks and Overhang (or lack thereof) &#124; stockspinoffblog.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockspinoffblog.com/?p=341#comment-493</guid>
		<description>[...] IPO in which the parent had retained a significant number of shares as was recently the case with Bristol-Myers Squibb&#8217;s stock spin-off of Mead Johnson Nutritional which is another whole kettle of fish as discussed here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] IPO in which the parent had retained a significant number of shares as was recently the case with Bristol-Myers Squibb&#8217;s stock spin-off of Mead Johnson Nutritional which is another whole kettle of fish as discussed here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Stock Spin-off Investing by Lessons From Mead Johnson&#8217;s IPO Stock Spin-Off &#124; Stocks and Sectors</title>
		<link>http://stockspinoffblog.com/61/comment-page-1/#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>Lessons From Mead Johnson&#8217;s IPO Stock Spin-Off &#124; Stocks and Sectors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockspinoffblog.com/?page_id=61#comment-492</guid>
		<description>[...] unit I wasn&#8217;t too excited about it, because I figured that it didn&#8217;t fit the successful spin-off stock model that tends to create a value situation. But I overlooked one way that it did create value, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] unit I wasn&rsquo;t too excited about it, because I figured that it didn&rsquo;t fit the successful spin-off stock model that tends to create a value situation. But I overlooked one way that it did create value, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Stock Spin-off Investing by Lessons From Mead Johnson&#8217;s IPO Stock Spin-Off</title>
		<link>http://stockspinoffblog.com/61/comment-page-1/#comment-490</link>
		<dc:creator>Lessons From Mead Johnson&#8217;s IPO Stock Spin-Off</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockspinoffblog.com/?page_id=61#comment-490</guid>
		<description>[...] unit I wasn&#8217;t too excited about it, because I figured that it didn&#8217;t fit the successful spin-off stock model that tends to create a value situation. But I overlooked one way that it did create value, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] unit I wasn&rsquo;t too excited about it, because I figured that it didn&rsquo;t fit the successful spin-off stock model that tends to create a value situation. But I overlooked one way that it did create value, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Stock Spin-off Investing by Lessons From Mead Johnson&#8217;s IPO Stock Spin-Off &#124; Reaction Radio</title>
		<link>http://stockspinoffblog.com/61/comment-page-1/#comment-489</link>
		<dc:creator>Lessons From Mead Johnson&#8217;s IPO Stock Spin-Off &#124; Reaction Radio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 09:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockspinoffblog.com/?page_id=61#comment-489</guid>
		<description>[...] unit I wasn&#8217;t too excited about it, because I figured that it didn&#8217;t fit the successful spin-off stock model that tends to create a value situation. But I overlooked one way that it did create value, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] unit I wasn&rsquo;t too excited about it, because I figured that it didn&rsquo;t fit the successful spin-off stock model that tends to create a value situation. But I overlooked one way that it did create value, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Stock Spin-off Investing by Mead Johnson (MJN) Stock Spin-off Via IPO Offers Lessons &#124; stockspinoffblog.com</title>
		<link>http://stockspinoffblog.com/61/comment-page-1/#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator>Mead Johnson (MJN) Stock Spin-off Via IPO Offers Lessons &#124; stockspinoffblog.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockspinoffblog.com/?page_id=61#comment-486</guid>
		<description>[...] &#160; Why Spinoffs? &#160; Find Spinoffs &#160;  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &nbsp; Why Spinoffs? &nbsp; Find Spinoffs &nbsp;  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Abraxis Bioscience To Spin Off Abraxis Health In 2010 by john</title>
		<link>http://stockspinoffblog.com/2010/01/29/abraxis-bioscience-to-spin-off-abraxis-health-in-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 03:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockspinoffblog.com/?p=324#comment-485</guid>
		<description>Any news that seems to be fitting the situation better since your last post?  Or, are these people just putting out teasers without the intention of really going forward?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any news that seems to be fitting the situation better since your last post?  Or, are these people just putting out teasers without the intention of really going forward?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on List of Stock Spin-offs For 2010 by john</title>
		<link>http://stockspinoffblog.com/2010/01/14/list-of-stock-spin-offs-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockspinoffblog.com/?p=314#comment-484</guid>
		<description>Good point.  I have gotten behind on my watch list.   Sorry.

john</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point.  I have gotten behind on my watch list.   Sorry.</p>
<p>john</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Entergy (ETR) Stock Spin-off To Go In Other Direction? by john</title>
		<link>http://stockspinoffblog.com/2009/11/03/entergy-etr-stock-spin-off-to-go-in-other-direction/comment-page-1/#comment-483</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 18:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockspinoffblog.com/?p=278#comment-483</guid>
		<description>Apparently New York wasn&#039;t too excited about the idea either finding &lt;a href &quot;http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN113976220100211&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Entergy&#039;s spinoff &quot;not in the public interest&quot;.&lt;/a&gt;  Now where does it go.  Seems as though it must be a good deal for ETR to get rid of the nuclear plants this way if New York and Vermont are so opposed to it.  Might this mean that in this case, the parent is a better bet than the spin-off? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently New York wasn&#8217;t too excited about the idea either finding <a href "http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN113976220100211" rel="nofollow">Entergy&#8217;s spinoff &#8220;not in the public interest&#8221;.</a>  Now where does it go.  Seems as though it must be a good deal for ETR to get rid of the nuclear plants this way if New York and Vermont are so opposed to it.  Might this mean that in this case, the parent is a better bet than the spin-off?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on List of Stock Spin-offs For 2010 by Vigrx Plus</title>
		<link>http://stockspinoffblog.com/2010/01/14/list-of-stock-spin-offs-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-481</link>
		<dc:creator>Vigrx Plus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 01:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockspinoffblog.com/?p=314#comment-481</guid>
		<description>Well I assent to but I think the collection should prepare more info then it has.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I assent to but I think the collection should prepare more info then it has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on List of Stock Spin-offs For 2010 by WP Themes</title>
		<link>http://stockspinoffblog.com/2010/01/14/list-of-stock-spin-offs-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-480</link>
		<dc:creator>WP Themes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockspinoffblog.com/?p=314#comment-480</guid>
		<description>Nice brief and this enter helped me alot in my college assignement. Say thank you you on your information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice brief and this enter helped me alot in my college assignement. Say thank you you on your information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
